League of Legends: Why are the remarks of players and coaches who have left the LPL region easily interpreted emotionally?

If you are a hardworking employee who leaves a toxic work environment and finds a better job opportunity, taking your career to new heights, would you be grateful to your former employer or remain magnanimous? Cultured people tend not to hold grudges. Even if they have crawled out of hell and achieved what they have today, it is impossible to express gratitude when asked about the past. They are filled with emotion, grateful that they had the strength to get to where they are today. It is only natural to feel the urgency of the past and make comparisons.

Take Redmi's "scandal" as an example. A single sentence expressing that his physical condition and eating experience were much better than before was inadvertently interpreted as sarcasm because he once played for the LPL. This makes one wonder whether the player or coach used inappropriate words or gave a problematic answer, or whether the remarks were amplified by emotions.

The LCK vs. LPL matchup is essentially an internal battle between gamers from two major regions in the League of Legends community. The LPL had its glorious period, but it was quickly surpassed by the LCK, which became the dominant force in S-level tournaments, a consecutive champion, the number one in the Korean server, and a place teeming with talent. Meanwhile, the LPL began to decline, its entertainment value plummeted, and even its streamers were losing their jobs. All these phenomena confirm the existence of problems. So what's the point of coming out to defend it now?

Is it satire? Is it narrative? It depends on one's perspective. The only certainty is that once achievements improve, fame increases, and one becomes a public figure, every word and action will be magnified and scrutinized.

Image source: Internet